Saturday, July 7, 2007

Visual Storytelling, Part II


Above is yet another example of narrative paintings, this one by Wes Christensen and titled “John’s Dilemma.”

As strange as I know this will sound, the painting above brings to mind two films: The Conversation and Raging Bull.

THE CONVERSATION

Notice all of the straight, rigid lines - the walls, the shelves, the books, the television, and even the sculptures. This reminds me of Harry Caul’s personal environment in The Conversation, a movie that came out of Francis Ford Coppola’s interest in repetition through symbols of the circular. To quote Jennifer Van Sijll in
Cinematic Storytelling, “What is being repeated is man’s emotional weakness represented by deceit and betrayal… Harry is a surveillance expert. His outer person is symbolized by the linear. He is rational, technically competent, detached, and remote. Coppola gives him clothes and a physical environment made up of straight, elongated lines. Harry’s job is dependent on the circular spinning wheels of the tape recorder. As long as he stays detached from their content, he is competent and stable.”



Harry, of course, gets drawn into the emotional lives of his subjects, which is his undoing, as the surveillance expert becomes the surveillance subject. There's a scene toward the end where he tries to change the outcome and enters the building of the man who hired him. According to Jennifer Van Sijll in Cinematic Storytelling, “He enters a building that is linear on the outside, but circular on the inside – just like Harry. Once inside, he is confronted on the circular stairwell by corporate thugs. Below him is a floor tiled in a circular pattern. Once ejected from the building, he is safe again. He walks along the linear structure almost disappearing into its gray lined walls.”

RAGING BULL

In Wes Christensen’s painting, did you notice the image on the TV set, which is from
the Psycho Shower Scene? Midway into Raging Bull, we see Jake La Motta try to fix his television set. He’s begun to lose his way mentally, and he’s become increasingly paranoid of those around him. Scorsese uses the intermittent TV signal to illustrate Jake's intermittent sanity and escalating mental agitation. When his wife enters and kisses Jake’s brother on the cheek, Jake’s paranoia is set off and the TV goes completely haywire.



To sum it up - if we are to take from all of those straight, rigid lines that John, like Harry Caul, is perhaps a rational, technically competent, detached, and remote individual, then the image on the television tells us that there is something very disturbing at the core of his "dilemma." And in fact, the other man looking at the television set appears to be quite disturbed with his hand covering his eyes. Or... perhaps John's just not having any luck with his garage sale.

Friday, July 6, 2007

Further Revelations of the Man of Mystery


Our very good friend, Edward Copeland, who I’m afraid may not be blogging with us much longer, tagged me to list 8 random facts / habits about myself. I had been tagged not long ago and shared 5 Personal Things. (See also Mystery Man in the News! Hehehe…)

This time around, I’d like to share some personal beliefs.

Hope you enjoy it.

(I'm already missing you, Ed.)

-MM

------------------------------------------

1. There is a horrifying disconnect between screenwriters and film scholars. I believe that aspiring screenwriters could learn more from film scholars (aka "film bloggers") then they would from most screenwriting gurus. I also believe that an improvement in the thinking behind new films begins with bridging that gap. (Take note on my sidebar - "Film Blogs" and "Goodies for Cinephiles.")

2. The second big education for screenwriters begins when they unlearn everything they thought they learned from
Robert McKee. (A sampling: Sympathetic Protagonists, Character Arcs, and Voice Overs.) When aspiring screenwriters start thinking for themselves, they’ll quickly realize that the reality of storytelling rarely fits the rigid, narrow-minded rules laid out by the gurus.

3. Here’s the key to growth for screenwriters: read everything like crazy, review other scripts like crazy, and watch films like crazy. Oh, and write like crazy, too. You can sleep when you’re dead. And you can start having a life after you master the craft.

4.
Napoleon is the greatest screenplay never produced.

5. All you pros can check your vanity at the door or just move along. Selling a script does not mean that you know what you’re doing. I've encountered 2 unknowns
on TriggerStreet whom I would consider "brilliant" and 1 flat-out "genius." No, I'm not kidding. The revolution is coming.

6. Avoid dating actors and porn stars. That’s all I’m saying. Hehehe

7. Anyone can make a difference by blogging about the craft. In the latest issue (May-June) of
CreativeScreenwriting Magazine, Karl Iglesias (author of 101 Habits of Highly Successful Screenwriters) has an article on "Subtext in Dialogue." WHERE OH WHERE could he have possibly found the inspiration to write such an article? (Perhaps here?) I don’t believe that anyone has ever studied or had a serious discussion about subtext until WE came along. I sent him an email. I never heard back from him.

8. I truly believe that down the road we will see a revolution in films. Kids are studying films and storytelling and the craft of screenwriting at a younger age. They’re also getting feedback on their scripts at a younger age, and when they get older, they will be unstoppable. Even those who are a little late getting into the game are improving their craft exponentially quicker than ever before.